Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
A review of domestic and foreign studies related to analyzing the factors of the lecturers’ scientific productivity and publication activity and the main approaches to their assessment is carried out. The main reasons preventing the creation of a competency-based model of the teaching success based on a set of different-sized assessment indicators are shown. A correlation-regression model is proposed for assessing the lecturers’ scientific productivity based on calculating an integral indicator that allows forming candidates for the dissertation council members in the related specialties, taking into account the significance of publications and the number of their citations. The developed integral indicator makes it possible to compare the scientific productivity of lecturers and both structural units and universities with each other. The integral criterion is based on assessing the lecturers’ scientific performance and publication activity on the domestic and international scientometric databases. The developed criterion was tested in the process of evaluating the lecturers’ scientific activities of the Department of Industrial and Digital Economics and the Department of Information Technology of Bryansk State Technical University. Examples of calculating the developed integral criterion based on the totality of such scientometric indicators as the number of publications, the number of citations, the average number of citations per publication, the number of articles on the lists of the State Commission for Academic Degrees and Titles, Web of Science and Scopus are given. Conclusions are drawn on the objectification of scientometric indicators for evaluating the lecturers’ publication activity and the examples of the practical use of indicators for assessing the lecturers’ scientific activity are given.

scientometrics, publication activity, productivity, performance, scientometric indicators, citation of articles, in-terviewing, lecturers’ rating

1. Andrievskaya N.K. Basic Principles and Approaches when Developing a System for Managing Professional Knowl-edge of University Employees. Informatika i kibernetika [Com-puter Science and Cybernetics], 2019, no. 4 (18), pp. 49-56.

2. Anisimov, A.P., Melnichenko R.G. Rating of Lecturers as Principle Indicator by Accreditation of High School. Pravo i obrazovaniye [Law and Education], 2011, no 6, pp. 4-10.

3. Bezborodova E.V., Shurinova T.B. Possibilities of Social and Professional Expertise as an Effective Mechanism for Evaluating Educational Organization Activities and Lecturers’ Professional Activities. Problemy sovremennogo obrazovaniya [Problems of Modern Education], 2018, no. 6, pp. 134-141.

4. Vasilyeva E.Yu. Approaches to Assessing the Quality of the University Teacher. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz [University Management: Practice and Analysis], 2006, no. 2 (11), pp. 74-78.

5. Golubeva G.F., Trishin A.A. Mass Open Online Courses in Russia and Abroad from Viewpoint of Global Information Space. Ergodizayn [Ergodesign], 2018, no. 2(02), pp. 8-14. DOI: 10.30987/article_5bf98b63306ed0.91342378.

6. Dulzon A.A., Vasilyeva O.M. Competence Model of a University Teacher. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz [University Management: Practice and Analysis], 2009, no. 2, pp. 29-37.

7. Petrova, I.V. University Teacher’s Rating: Compilation, Evaluation, Use. Ekonomika. Biznes. Informatika. [Economics. Business. Informatics.], 2016, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 175-189.

8. Zhurakovsky V.M., Sazonova Z.S. Advanced Training of Scientific and Pedagogical Personnel: the Search for New Organizational Forms. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher Education in Russia], 2010, no 2, pp. 82-87.

9. Zelenina E.B. Evaluation of the Professional Activity of a Young Lecturer of Higher Education in the Context of Personal and Professional Development. Izvestia: Herzen University Jour-nal of Humanities & Sciences, 2008, no. 2, pp. 82-87.

10. Molchanova N.V., Skantsev V.M., Spasennikov V.V. Debatable Issues of Evaluating the Effectiveness of Scientific Activity Using Citation Indices (Review of Domestic and For-eign Publications). Ergodizayn [Ergodesign], 2019, no. 4(6). pp. 186-195. DOI: 10.30987/2619-1512-2019-2019-4-186-195.

11. Litvinova L.I. Factors of Scientific Productivity and Problems of its Evaluation. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz [University Management: Practice and Analysis], 2018, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 61-65.

12. Dubols P. Productivity and Mobility in Academic Re-search: Evidence from Mathematicians. Scientometrics, 2014, vol. 98, no 3, pp. 1669-1701.

13. Abramo J., D’Angelo C.A., Solazzi M. The Relation-ship between Scientists’ Research Performance and the Degree of Internalization of the Research. Scientometrics, 2011, vol. 86, no 3, pp. 629-643.

14. Kirillova O.V., Soloshenko M.S. Comparative Analysis of Publication Activity and Citation Indices in Russia and East-ern Europe. Voprosy obrazovaniya [Educational Studies], 2012, no. 1, pp. 148-175.

15. Ovchinkin O.V., Pykhtin A.I., Ostrotskaya S.V., Ti-moshenko A.A. The system of Internal Monitoring of the Im-plementation of the Performance Indicators of the University. Sovremennyye naukoyomkiye tekhnologii [Modern High Tech-nologies], 2019, no. 4, pp. 50-54.

16. Kapralov I.A., Kadanov V.L., Pavlicheva E.N. Devel-opment of an Automated Rating System for the University De-partment. Informatsionnyye resursy Rossii [Information Re-sources of Russia], 2014, no. 2 (138), pp. 35-37.

17. Lazareva M.V., Gubanova E.V. Management Team of an Educational Organization: Approaches to Formation and De-velopment. Chelovek I Obrazovanie [Man and Education], 2020, no. 4 (65), pp. 147-151.

18. Lazarenko V.A., Lipatov V.A., Oleinikova T.A., Seve-rinov D.A., Filinov N.B. Efficiency of Ranking Implementation in University Management System. Vysshee obrazovanie v Ros-sii [Higher Education in Russia], 2018, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 9-19.

19. Spasennikov V.V., Garbuzova G.V., Ermakova E.A. Ergonomic Support for the Development of a Graphic Colour Scale for Student Assessment of Teaching Activities. Vestnik Yaroslavskogo gocudarstvennogo universiteta im. P. G. Demi-dova. Seriya Humanitarnye nauki [Bulletin of P.G. Demidov Yaroslavl State University. Series Humanities], 2021, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 111-119.

20. Sukharev O. S., Spasennikov V.V. Transformation of Higher Education: Overcoming the Conflict of Competencies and Fundamentality, Ergodizayn [Ergodesign], 2020, no. 3 (09), pp. 107-119. DOI: 10.30987/2658-4026-2020-3-107-119.

21. Pakhomov, S.I., Gurtov V.A., Pennie I.V. Management of Dissertation Council Network Quantitative and Qualitative Composition Based on Rating Systems. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz [University Management: Practice and Analysis], 2013, no. 1 (83), pp. 51-59.

22. Spasennikov V.V., Golubeva G.F. Assessment of the Investment Attractiveness of Universities Using Indicators of Scientific Potential. Vestnik Kostromskoo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. N. A. Nekrasova [Bulletin of Kostroma State University named after N.A. Nekrasov], 2013, no. 6, pp. 47-50.

23. Rubinshtein A.Ya. State Paternalism: Scientometric Failure. Zhurnal institucional’nyh issledovanij [Journal of Intui-tional Studies], 2021, no. 13 (3), pp. 20-36. DOI:10.17835/2076-6927.2021.13.3.020-036.6927.2021.13.3.020-036.

24. Morgun A.N., Oleinik Yu.N., Zhuravlev A. L. Institu-tional Factors in the Development of Domestic Psychology (on the Material of the RSCI). Psikhologicheskii zhurnal [Psycholog-ical Journal], 2021, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 11-121.

25. Mazilov, V.A., Slepko Yu.. N. Psychology in the Lens of Scientometrics. Institut psikhologii Rossiyskoy akademii nauk. Sotsial'naya i ekonomicheskaya psikhologiya [Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Social and Economic Psychology], 2021, vol. 6, no. 3 (23), pp. 342-367.

26. Hirsch, J. E. An Index to Qualify an Individual’s Scien-tific Research Output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 2005, vol. 102, iss. 46, pp. 569-572. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0507655102.

27. Spasennikov V.V., Androsov K. Yu. Scientometric Iin-dicators and Features of Evaluating the Scholars’ Scientific Ac-tivity Effectiveness Using Citation Indices (A Review of Domestic and Foreign Studies). Ergodizayn [Ergodesign], 2021, no. 3 (13), pp. 219-232. .DOI: 10.30987/2658-4026-2021-3-219-232.

28. Spasennikov V.V. Comparative Analysis of Domestic Psychologists and Ergonomists’ Publication Activity Using Cita-tion Indicators, Ergodizayn [Ergodesign], 2021, no. 4 (14), pp. 233-244.

Login or Create
* Forgot password?