REQUIREMENTS

for publishing papers in the journal

«SCIENCE INTENSIVE TECHNOLOGIES IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING»

An example of an article in accordance with GOST R 7.07-2021

For publication in the journal papers are submitted electronically as follows:

1. The text of the article (no more than 15 pages) in a Microsoft Word file format (without figures and tables).

2. Numbered illustrations (up to 6 pcs.) in a Microsoft Word file format.

3. Original illustrations as raster graphics files (.jpeg, .tiff formats, etc.) with a resolution of 400 or more dots per inch (dpi). Lettering in figures should be 10 points in Times, upright (not in italics and not in bold), starting with a capital letter.  

4. Captions under figures (separately) in a Microsoft Word file format.

5. Tables (separately) in a Microsoft Word file format (if there are any).

6. Information on the authors (surname, first name, patronymic, academic degree, academic title, the name of the institution and the department where the author works or studies (city and country), his position, phone and email, Open Researcher and Contributor ID – ORCID (if available) in a Microsoft Word file format.

7. Review on the possibility of open publication.

8. Depersonalized text of the article for blind review.

Requirements for the text of the paper

The text should have the following structure:

1. Information about the paper:

1.1. Paper type: scientific paper, review paper, editorial paper, discussion paper, editorial note, book review, paper review, etc.

1.2. Paper title (it should be brief but informative).

1.3. Full name of the authors.

1.4. Address of the author (the name of the institution and the department where the author works or studies, address of the institution (city and country), email).

1.5. Abstract should be contain no more than 5 lines. The word «Abstract» is given before its text.

1.6. Keywords should correspond to the subject matter of the paper and its terminological area. Bo not use generalized and polysemantic words, as well as phrases containing participial constructions. The number of keywords (phrases) should not be less than 3 and not more than 7 words (phrases). They are given after the word «Keywords», and separated from each other by commas. Do not put full stop after the keywords.

1.7. If the authors consider it necessary, after the keywords, acknowledgments are given to organizations (institutions), scientific supervisors and other persons who assisted in the preparation of the paper, information about grants, funding for preparing and publishing the paper, projects, research works, within the framework of or based on the results of which the paper is published. This information is given after the word «Acknowledgments».

Also data on funding of the research, preparation and publication of the paper can be given separately after the word «Funding».

2. Paper text. It should be in font size 12 pt Times New Roman with line spacing 1.5. All pages should be numbered. All measurements should be in SI units. Formulas should be given in the formula editor of MS Word (Word 2007 and newer).

3. Reference list should not exceed 10 references. References should not be earlier the year 1970. The list of after-text bibliographic references includes only those sources that are mentioned or quoted in the text of the paper. References in the list are numbered and arranged in the order of their citation in the text of the paper.

Example:

Author, A. A., Author, B. B., & Author, C. C. (2005). Title of article. Title of Journal, 10(2), 49-53.

4. Data on the contribution of each author, if the paper has several authors, are given at the end of the paper. This information is preceded by the words «Contribution of the authors». After the surname and initials of the author, his personal contribution to the paper is briefly described (idea, collection of materials, processing of materials, writing of the paper, scientific editing of the text, etc.).

5. Data on the absence or presence of conflict of interests and the details of such a conflict, if any.

Example: Contribution of the authors: all authors have made an equivalent contribution to the preparation of the publication.

             The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests.

Submit a manuscript: https://bstu.editorum.ru/en/nauka/user/pubs/all

DECLARATION OF PUBLICATION ETHICS

The editorial policy of the journal Science Intensive Technologies in Mechanical Engineering is based on the traditional ethical principles of the Russian scientific journals and on the international ethical standards of editors and publishers in conducting, describing, editing and publishing the results of scientific work. The principles of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), the basic principles of the Declaration "Ethical Principles of Scientific Publications" of the Committee on Publication Ethics of the Association of Science Editors and Publishers (ASEP), as well as the provisions of Chapter 70 "Copyright" of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation are the basis of the Editorial Policy of the Journal.

The editorial board of Science Intensive Technologies in Mechanical Engineering adheres its activities to the provisions of WMA Declaration of Helsinki - Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects and does its best to ensure compliance with ethical norms and rules for data collection for research conducted with the participation of people. Violation of publication ethics of the journal results in refusal to publish.

1. Responsibilities of the publisher

The publisher is responsible for the publication of copyrighted works.

The publisher and the founder should follow the principles and procedures that facilitate the implementation of ethical standards of publications by editors, reviewers and authors. They have no right to influence the editorial policy of the journal. The editorial board of Science Intensive Technologies in Mechanical Engineering makes an independent decision on the expediency of publishing a paper without interference of the publisher and founder.

The publisher and the founder should provide legal and other support to the editorial board, if necessary, including investigations of cases of unfair research and publication practices, and should facilitate the resolution of these issues. They ensure the timely release of journal issues. The publisher and the founder, subject to the agreement with the editor-in-chief, publish edits, explanations and reject papers in which violations of scientific ethics or critical errors have been identified.

In cases of violation of publication ethics on the part of the editor, author or reviewer, a mandatory investigation is required. This applies to both published and unpublished materials. The editorial board should demand clarification without involving persons who may have a conflict of interest with one of the parties. If the material containing significant inaccuracies has been published, it should be corrected immediately in a form accessible to readers and indexing systems. In order to ensure the reliability of the published data, if indisputable errors are found in the work, it is possible to publish corrections, clarifications, rejections and apologies as soon as possible.

All parties should avoid conflicts of interests in any form at all stages of publishing the article. In the case of a conflict of interest in any form, the person who first discovered such a conflict should immediately inform the editorial board. The same applies to any violations of generally accepted ethical norms and rules.

In case of ethical claims concerning articles published in the journal, the editor-in-chief, together with the publisher and the founder, take appropriate measures based on "Retraction Guidelines" of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). These measures include conducting an investigation of the fact of unethical behavior by the editorial board of Science Intensive Technologies in Mechanical Engineering, interaction with the authors of the scientific paper and argumentation of the relevant complaint or the claim of the applicant, and also imply interaction with relevant organizations and research centers for cooperation in cases of unfair research and retraction of the publication.

2. Responsibilities of authors

When submitting a paper to the editorial office, authors should adhere to a responsible approach and be aware of personal responsibility for the novelty and reliability of the results of scientific research.

The decision to accept papers for publication is based on:

- the originality of the text;

- scientific relevance and novelty of the material;

- reliability of statistical data and research results;

- compliance of papers with the journal profile;

- objectivity of arguments.

By submitting a paper to the editorial board, the authors thereby confirm that this paper is original, has not been previously published and is not under consideration by the editorial board of another journal. The results discussed in the paper should meet the criterion of reproducibility by other researchers. All data processing methods, as well as the logic of their interpretation, should be absolutely transparent.

All materials submitted to the editorial office are checked using "Antiplagiat" system (https://tu-bryansk.antiplagiat.ru/). If numerous references (duplicate publication, plagiarism, self-plagiarism, unfair citation, etc.), the editorial board has the right to refuse all co-authors further cooperation.

Authors can use financial support when publishing their research (all sources of funding should be indicated by the authors in the paper).

Authors should provide only authentic facts and information in the manuscript; do not use information obtained privately (in correspondence, conversation, discussion with third parties or in the provision of confidential services), without written permission of a third party; do not allow fabrication and falsification of data.

All persons who have made a significant contribution to the research should be listed as co-authors of the paper. The author undertakes to indicate correctly all scientific and other sources in the reference list that he used during the preparation of the paper and which had a significant impact on the results of the study. If the author discovers significant errors or inaccuracies in the publication, he must inform the editor of the journal and interact with him to correct the manuscript as soon as possible.

3. Responsibilities of the editor

The editorial board is fully responsible and has the authority to reject or accept papers for publication and should not have a conflict of interest with the materials that are rejected or accepted for publication. The editorial board ensures the confidentiality of the submitted materials until they are accepted for publication. It decides which of the submitted articles should be published based on the results of the verification of compliance with the conditions of publication and the results of the review.

The editorial board of the journal evaluates only the scientific content of the article, regardless of race, nationality, origin, citizenship, gender, occupation, place of work, residence of the author, as well as his political, philosophical, religious and other views.

The editorial board guarantees that the materials of the scientific paper rejected from publication will not be used in the works of the editorial board members without written permission of the author. The final texts of papers should be agreed with the authors. The editorial board protects the reputation of the authors and takes seriously all cases of plagiarism and other facts of unfair behavior when publishing a scientific paper.

The editorial board under no circumstances should force authors to cite articles published in Science Intensive Technologies in Mechanical Engineering or other periodicals as a necessary condition to accept the manuscript for consideration and publication.

Carrying out activities, editors rely on the editorial board. The general management of the editorial office is carried out by the editor-in-chief and deputy editor-in-chief. The editorial board constantly cooperates with other publishers and industry associations on various issues, including ethical issues.

4. Responsibilities of peer reviewers

The reviewers of the journal follow exclusively "double blind" peer review policy. Reviewers carry out a scientific examination of the author's materials and their actions should be unbiased, which means the implementation of the following principles.

The editorial board ensures that reviewers are anonymous.

Reviewers are required to have sufficient qualifications for an expert assessment of the content of a scientific paper. Reviewers should participate in forming the editorial policy of the journal, give an objective assessment (personal criticism of the author is unacceptable). They should submit a review within the time limits specified by the editorial board of the journal. Reviewers should clearly express their opinion giving arguments. Unpublished information obtained from the manuscripts submitted for consideration cannot be used for personal purposes without the written permission of the authors.

If the reviewer identifies incorrect, erroneous provisions or distorted data, he reports this to the editorial board of the journal in the prescribed manner so that the identified violations are eliminated by the author. Reviewers should also indicate the works that influenced the results of the study, but were not given by the author, if any, so they protect the rights of third parties from unauthorized use of materials.

1. The Editorial Board carries out the examination of the completeness of documentation submitted (in accordance with Article 4), analyzes a text of the paper to identify borrowings with the use of the “Anti-plagiarism” system and reviews papers using criteria of topicality, scientific novelty, information value, correspondence to scientific-technical directions of the journal.

2. If according to the recommendation of the editorial council a paper is sent for rework (up to 7 work days), then a date of the revised text submission is pointed out.

3. Authors do not receive author’s emoluments.

4. The papers, which do not correspond to the themes of the scientific-technical journal and do not meet the present requirements and also submitted with the completeness violations should not be accepted for the review. Manuscripts are not sent back. The editorial board is not bound to review all materials submitted and does not lead discussions with the authors of papers rejected.

Authors who publish with the Science intensive technologies in mechanical engineering agree to the following terms:

1.         Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

2.         Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

3.         Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

Copyright agreement

The publication reviews all materials submitted to the editorial office that correspond to its subject matter, for the purpose of their expert evaluation. All reviewers have an academic degree of Doctor of Technical Sciences, are recognized experts on the subject of peer-reviewed materials and have had publications on the subject of the reviewed article for the last 3 years. The recommendations of the reviewers are the basis for making a decision on the publication of the article. The review in the form of a copy is submitted to the editorial board of the journal within the time limits set by the editorial board. Reviewers may be members of the editorial board of the journal.

When positive (or negative) reviews of the article in question are received by the editorial board of the journal, one of the members of the editorial board in charge of the heading in which the article is supposed to be published, the editor-in-chief or deputy editor-in-chief gets acquainted with it and decides on the possibility of its publication or rejection.

This journal uses double-blind review, which means that both the reviewer and author identities are concealed from the reviewers, and vice versa, throughout the review process. To facilitate this, authors need to ensure that their manuscripts are prepared in a way that does not give away their identity.  To help with this preparation please ensure the following :

Submit the Title Page containing the Authors details and Blinded Manuscript with no author details as 2 separate files.

Information to help prepare the Blinded Manuscript:

Besides the obvious need to remove names and affiliations under the title within the manuscript, there are other steps that need to be taken to ensure the manuscript is correctly prepared for double-blind peer review.  To assist with this process the key items that need to be observed are as follows:

Use the third person to refer to work the Authors have previously undertaken, e.g. replace any phrases like “as we have shown before” with “… has been shown before [Anonymous, 2007]” .

Make sure figures do not contain any affiliation related identifier

Do not eliminate essential self-references or other references but limit self-references only to papers that are relevant for those reviewing the submitted paper.

Cite papers published by the Author in the text as follows:  ‘[Anonymous, 2007]’.

For blinding in the reference list:  ‘[Anonymous 2007] Details omitted for double-blind reviewing.’

Remove references to funding sources

Do not include acknowledgments

Remove any identifying information, including author names, from file names and ensure document properties are also anonymized.

List of retracted articles

The Information about retraction articles are published in the journal and provided to electronic libraries and other information sources.

The magazine is distributed by subscription. For 2023 , you can issue:

- on the website of the "United catalog "Press of Russia" www.pressa-rf.ru . Catalog index: 79195;

- on the website of the "Internet catalog "Subscription Press" www.akc.ru . Catalog index: E79195.

You can purchase the magazine from the publisher.

Contacts:

Mikhail Shalygin, Deputy Editor-in-Chief; phone: +7-903-868-85-68; e-mail: editntm@yandex.ru

Publication fee is not charged.

The mission of the Journal consists in the presentation of an open area for the distribution and exchange with the information regarding the results of original works carried out by the authors of publications in the field of mechanical engineering, metal working, material science and metallurgy.

REQUIREMENTS

for publishing papers in the journal

«SCIENCE INTENSIVE TECHNOLOGIES IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING»

An example of an article in accordance with GOST R 7.07-2021

For publication in the journal papers are submitted electronically as follows:

1. The text of the article (no more than 15 pages) in a Microsoft Word file format (without figures and tables).

2. Numbered illustrations (up to 6 pcs.) in a Microsoft Word file format.

3. Original illustrations as raster graphics files (.jpeg, .tiff formats, etc.) with a resolution of 400 or more dots per inch (dpi). Lettering in figures should be 10 points in Times, upright (not in italics and not in bold), starting with a capital letter.  

4. Captions under figures (separately) in a Microsoft Word file format.

5. Tables (separately) in a Microsoft Word file format (if there are any).

6. Information on the authors (surname, first name, patronymic, academic degree, academic title, the name of the institution and the department where the author works or studies (city and country), his position, phone and email, Open Researcher and Contributor ID – ORCID (if available) in a Microsoft Word file format.

7. Review on the possibility of open publication.

8. Depersonalized text of the article for blind review.

Requirements for the text of the paper

The text should have the following structure:

1. Information about the paper:

1.1. Paper type: scientific paper, review paper, editorial paper, discussion paper, editorial note, book review, paper review, etc.

1.2. Paper title (it should be brief but informative).

1.3. Full name of the authors.

1.4. Address of the author (the name of the institution and the department where the author works or studies, address of the institution (city and country), email).

1.5. Abstract should be contain no more than 5 lines. The word «Abstract» is given before its text.

1.6. Keywords should correspond to the subject matter of the paper and its terminological area. Bo not use generalized and polysemantic words, as well as phrases containing participial constructions. The number of keywords (phrases) should not be less than 3 and not more than 7 words (phrases). They are given after the word «Keywords», and separated from each other by commas. Do not put full stop after the keywords.

1.7. If the authors consider it necessary, after the keywords, acknowledgments are given to organizations (institutions), scientific supervisors and other persons who assisted in the preparation of the paper, information about grants, funding for preparing and publishing the paper, projects, research works, within the framework of or based on the results of which the paper is published. This information is given after the word «Acknowledgments».

Also data on funding of the research, preparation and publication of the paper can be given separately after the word «Funding».

2. Paper text. It should be in font size 12 pt Times New Roman with line spacing 1.5. All pages should be numbered. All measurements should be in SI units. Formulas should be given in the formula editor of MS Word (Word 2007 and newer).

3. Reference list should not exceed 10 references. References should not be earlier the year 1970. The list of after-text bibliographic references includes only those sources that are mentioned or quoted in the text of the paper. References in the list are numbered and arranged in the order of their citation in the text of the paper.

Example:

Author, A. A., Author, B. B., & Author, C. C. (2005). Title of article. Title of Journal, 10(2), 49-53.

4. Data on the contribution of each author, if the paper has several authors, are given at the end of the paper. This information is preceded by the words «Contribution of the authors». After the surname and initials of the author, his personal contribution to the paper is briefly described (idea, collection of materials, processing of materials, writing of the paper, scientific editing of the text, etc.).

5. Data on the absence or presence of conflict of interests and the details of such a conflict, if any.

Example: Contribution of the authors: all authors have made an equivalent contribution to the preparation of the publication.

             The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests.

Submit a manuscript: https://bstu.editorum.ru/en/nauka/user/pubs/all

DECLARATION OF PUBLICATION ETHICS

The editorial policy of the journal Science Intensive Technologies in Mechanical Engineering is based on the traditional ethical principles of the Russian scientific journals and on the international ethical standards of editors and publishers in conducting, describing, editing and publishing the results of scientific work. The principles of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), the basic principles of the Declaration "Ethical Principles of Scientific Publications" of the Committee on Publication Ethics of the Association of Science Editors and Publishers (ASEP), as well as the provisions of Chapter 70 "Copyright" of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation are the basis of the Editorial Policy of the Journal.

The editorial board of Science Intensive Technologies in Mechanical Engineering adheres its activities to the provisions of WMA Declaration of Helsinki - Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects and does its best to ensure compliance with ethical norms and rules for data collection for research conducted with the participation of people. Violation of publication ethics of the journal results in refusal to publish.

1. Responsibilities of the publisher

The publisher is responsible for the publication of copyrighted works.

The publisher and the founder should follow the principles and procedures that facilitate the implementation of ethical standards of publications by editors, reviewers and authors. They have no right to influence the editorial policy of the journal. The editorial board of Science Intensive Technologies in Mechanical Engineering makes an independent decision on the expediency of publishing a paper without interference of the publisher and founder.

The publisher and the founder should provide legal and other support to the editorial board, if necessary, including investigations of cases of unfair research and publication practices, and should facilitate the resolution of these issues. They ensure the timely release of journal issues. The publisher and the founder, subject to the agreement with the editor-in-chief, publish edits, explanations and reject papers in which violations of scientific ethics or critical errors have been identified.

In cases of violation of publication ethics on the part of the editor, author or reviewer, a mandatory investigation is required. This applies to both published and unpublished materials. The editorial board should demand clarification without involving persons who may have a conflict of interest with one of the parties. If the material containing significant inaccuracies has been published, it should be corrected immediately in a form accessible to readers and indexing systems. In order to ensure the reliability of the published data, if indisputable errors are found in the work, it is possible to publish corrections, clarifications, rejections and apologies as soon as possible.

All parties should avoid conflicts of interests in any form at all stages of publishing the article. In the case of a conflict of interest in any form, the person who first discovered such a conflict should immediately inform the editorial board. The same applies to any violations of generally accepted ethical norms and rules.

In case of ethical claims concerning articles published in the journal, the editor-in-chief, together with the publisher and the founder, take appropriate measures based on "Retraction Guidelines" of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). These measures include conducting an investigation of the fact of unethical behavior by the editorial board of Science Intensive Technologies in Mechanical Engineering, interaction with the authors of the scientific paper and argumentation of the relevant complaint or the claim of the applicant, and also imply interaction with relevant organizations and research centers for cooperation in cases of unfair research and retraction of the publication.

2. Responsibilities of authors

When submitting a paper to the editorial office, authors should adhere to a responsible approach and be aware of personal responsibility for the novelty and reliability of the results of scientific research.

The decision to accept papers for publication is based on:

- the originality of the text;

- scientific relevance and novelty of the material;

- reliability of statistical data and research results;

- compliance of papers with the journal profile;

- objectivity of arguments.

By submitting a paper to the editorial board, the authors thereby confirm that this paper is original, has not been previously published and is not under consideration by the editorial board of another journal. The results discussed in the paper should meet the criterion of reproducibility by other researchers. All data processing methods, as well as the logic of their interpretation, should be absolutely transparent.

All materials submitted to the editorial office are checked using "Antiplagiat" system (https://tu-bryansk.antiplagiat.ru/). If numerous references (duplicate publication, plagiarism, self-plagiarism, unfair citation, etc.), the editorial board has the right to refuse all co-authors further cooperation.

Authors can use financial support when publishing their research (all sources of funding should be indicated by the authors in the paper).

Authors should provide only authentic facts and information in the manuscript; do not use information obtained privately (in correspondence, conversation, discussion with third parties or in the provision of confidential services), without written permission of a third party; do not allow fabrication and falsification of data.

All persons who have made a significant contribution to the research should be listed as co-authors of the paper. The author undertakes to indicate correctly all scientific and other sources in the reference list that he used during the preparation of the paper and which had a significant impact on the results of the study. If the author discovers significant errors or inaccuracies in the publication, he must inform the editor of the journal and interact with him to correct the manuscript as soon as possible.

3. Responsibilities of the editor

The editorial board is fully responsible and has the authority to reject or accept papers for publication and should not have a conflict of interest with the materials that are rejected or accepted for publication. The editorial board ensures the confidentiality of the submitted materials until they are accepted for publication. It decides which of the submitted articles should be published based on the results of the verification of compliance with the conditions of publication and the results of the review.

The editorial board of the journal evaluates only the scientific content of the article, regardless of race, nationality, origin, citizenship, gender, occupation, place of work, residence of the author, as well as his political, philosophical, religious and other views.

The editorial board guarantees that the materials of the scientific paper rejected from publication will not be used in the works of the editorial board members without written permission of the author. The final texts of papers should be agreed with the authors. The editorial board protects the reputation of the authors and takes seriously all cases of plagiarism and other facts of unfair behavior when publishing a scientific paper.

The editorial board under no circumstances should force authors to cite articles published in Science Intensive Technologies in Mechanical Engineering or other periodicals as a necessary condition to accept the manuscript for consideration and publication.

Carrying out activities, editors rely on the editorial board. The general management of the editorial office is carried out by the editor-in-chief and deputy editor-in-chief. The editorial board constantly cooperates with other publishers and industry associations on various issues, including ethical issues.

4. Responsibilities of peer reviewers

The reviewers of the journal follow exclusively "double blind" peer review policy. Reviewers carry out a scientific examination of the author's materials and their actions should be unbiased, which means the implementation of the following principles.

The editorial board ensures that reviewers are anonymous.

Reviewers are required to have sufficient qualifications for an expert assessment of the content of a scientific paper. Reviewers should participate in forming the editorial policy of the journal, give an objective assessment (personal criticism of the author is unacceptable). They should submit a review within the time limits specified by the editorial board of the journal. Reviewers should clearly express their opinion giving arguments. Unpublished information obtained from the manuscripts submitted for consideration cannot be used for personal purposes without the written permission of the authors.

If the reviewer identifies incorrect, erroneous provisions or distorted data, he reports this to the editorial board of the journal in the prescribed manner so that the identified violations are eliminated by the author. Reviewers should also indicate the works that influenced the results of the study, but were not given by the author, if any, so they protect the rights of third parties from unauthorized use of materials.

1. The Editorial Board carries out the examination of the completeness of documentation submitted (in accordance with Article 4), analyzes a text of the paper to identify borrowings with the use of the “Anti-plagiarism” system and reviews papers using criteria of topicality, scientific novelty, information value, correspondence to scientific-technical directions of the journal.

2. If according to the recommendation of the editorial council a paper is sent for rework (up to 7 work days), then a date of the revised text submission is pointed out.

3. Authors do not receive author’s emoluments.

4. The papers, which do not correspond to the themes of the scientific-technical journal and do not meet the present requirements and also submitted with the completeness violations should not be accepted for the review. Manuscripts are not sent back. The editorial board is not bound to review all materials submitted and does not lead discussions with the authors of papers rejected.

Authors who publish with the Science intensive technologies in mechanical engineering agree to the following terms:

1.         Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

2.         Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

3.         Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

Copyright agreement

ADVERTISEMENT PLACEMENT

in scientific publications

ADVERTISEMENT PLACEMENT

on the sites of scientific publications

The publication reviews all materials submitted to the editorial office that correspond to its subject matter, for the purpose of their expert evaluation. All reviewers have an academic degree of Doctor of Technical Sciences, are recognized experts on the subject of peer-reviewed materials and have had publications on the subject of the reviewed article for the last 3 years. The recommendations of the reviewers are the basis for making a decision on the publication of the article. The review in the form of a copy is submitted to the editorial board of the journal within the time limits set by the editorial board. Reviewers may be members of the editorial board of the journal.

When positive (or negative) reviews of the article in question are received by the editorial board of the journal, one of the members of the editorial board in charge of the heading in which the article is supposed to be published, the editor-in-chief or deputy editor-in-chief gets acquainted with it and decides on the possibility of its publication or rejection.

This journal uses double-blind review, which means that both the reviewer and author identities are concealed from the reviewers, and vice versa, throughout the review process. To facilitate this, authors need to ensure that their manuscripts are prepared in a way that does not give away their identity.  To help with this preparation please ensure the following :

Submit the Title Page containing the Authors details and Blinded Manuscript with no author details as 2 separate files.

Information to help prepare the Blinded Manuscript:

Besides the obvious need to remove names and affiliations under the title within the manuscript, there are other steps that need to be taken to ensure the manuscript is correctly prepared for double-blind peer review.  To assist with this process the key items that need to be observed are as follows:

Use the third person to refer to work the Authors have previously undertaken, e.g. replace any phrases like “as we have shown before” with “… has been shown before [Anonymous, 2007]” .

Make sure figures do not contain any affiliation related identifier

Do not eliminate essential self-references or other references but limit self-references only to papers that are relevant for those reviewing the submitted paper.

Cite papers published by the Author in the text as follows:  ‘[Anonymous, 2007]’.

For blinding in the reference list:  ‘[Anonymous 2007] Details omitted for double-blind reviewing.’

Remove references to funding sources

Do not include acknowledgments

Remove any identifying information, including author names, from file names and ensure document properties are also anonymized.

List of retracted articles

The Information about retraction articles are published in the journal and provided to electronic libraries and other information sources.

Publication fee is not charged.

The magazine is distributed by subscription. For 2023 , you can issue:

- on the website of the "United catalog "Press of Russia" www.pressa-rf.ru . Catalog index: 79195;

- on the website of the "Internet catalog "Subscription Press" www.akc.ru . Catalog index: E79195.

You can purchase the magazine from the publisher.

Contacts:

Mikhail Shalygin, Deputy Editor-in-Chief; phone: +7-903-868-85-68; e-mail: editntm@yandex.ru

Periodicity of the journal - monthly; volume – up to 100 pages.

Khandozhko Viktor Bryansk State Technical University ( kafedra "Avtomatizirovannye tehnicheskie sistemy" , zaveduyuschiy )
candidate of technical sciences

Abdullaev Gurban Sumgait State University ( kafedra "Metrologiya i standartizaciya" , Head of the department )
candidate of technical sciences

docent

Abzaev Rinat Perm National Research Polytechnic University ( kafedra «Innovacionnye tehnologii mashinostroeniya» , Assistant )

Averchenkov Andrey Bryansk State Technical University ( department “Computer technologies and Systems” , Head )
doctor of technical sciences

docent

Averchenkov Vladimir Bryansk State Technical University ( kafedra «Komp'yuternye tehnologii i sistemy» , Professor )
doctor of technical sciences

professor

Avramov M.

Agapov Sergey Volgograd State Technical University ( kafedra "Tehnologiya mashinostroeniya" , Prof. )
doctor of technical sciences

Ageeva Aleksandra

Adamini F.

Albagachiev Ali Mechanical Engineering Research Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences ( Head of the department )
employee
doctor of technical sciences

professor

Aleksandrov V

Aleksandrov V. The Moscow State Technical University - MADI ( professor )
doctor of technical sciences

Alexandrov Victor The Moscow State Technical University - MADI ( Prof. )
doctor of technical sciences

docent

Alexandrov Vladimir The Moscow State Technical University - MADI ( kafedra "Tehnologii konstrukcionnyh materialov" , ass. prof. )
candidate of technical sciences

Alexandrova Svetlana Moscow Aviation Institute (National Research University) ( docent )
candidate of technical sciences

docent

Alexandrova Svetlana Moskovskiy aviacionnyy institut (nacional'nyy issledovatel'skiy universitet) MAI, g. Moskva, Rossiya

Alexeychuk Vasilisa Volgograd State Technical University ( kafedra "Tehnologiya mashinostroeniya" , magistrant )

Alen’kin Alexsandr Bryansk State Technical University ( kafedra «Metallorezhuschie stanki i instrumenty» , magistrant )

Alehin Sergey Bryansk State Technical University ( Department of Transport Engineering , Post graduate student )

Alekhnovich Valentin Bauman Moscow State Technical University ( kafedra "Prikladnaya matematika" , docent )
candidate of technical sciences

• « 
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5
• …
• 75
•  »

VAC

GRNTI