Брянский государственный технический университет

Inclusion into the editorial database the documentation package for scientific work publication sent from the authors to the Editorial Board e-mail or the electronic Editorial Board of the Journal (on site).
Check-up of the material completeness presented by authors for scientific paper publication.
Manuscript check-up for borrowing presence with the use of “Anti-plagiarism” system. At the borrowing permissible level exceeding (more than 30%) follows the notification of authors regarding the necessity of correction the material submitted.
Peer review of a scientific paper by the staff of the Editorial Council of the Journal.
Maintenance of the paper peer review by the Editorial Council staff of the Journal.
Notification of authors regarding the necessity of paper material improvement (in the presence of peer readers’ recommendations) or the refusal to publish a paper in the Journal (by e-mail).
Check-up of the peer readers’ remarks fulfillment (in the presence of remarks) by the authors.
Scientific and literary editing the electronic form of papers, essential assistance to authors in the matter of the paper structure improvement, terms choice, figures formation, references correction in accordance with RSS R 7.0.5-2008 “References. General Requirements and Rules of Formation”.
Check-up in accordance with original sources the correctness of citations used and digital data, the application of names and their spelling, scientific-technical terms, measurement units, the correspondence of the symbols used to notations defined by standards or adopted in scientific literature.
Paper text agreement by means of e-mail after editing.
Technical translation into English of the paper title, author’s name, paper abstract, key words, authors’ data and references.
Preparation of the electronic version of the Licensing Agreement between the Editorial Board of the Journal and authors on authors’ data processing, metadata formation of the paper to be published to confer it the identifier of DOI (Digital Object Identifier) with the purpose of the further offer to the users of Internet a possibility to search, review and free use paper materials with the information, scientific and educational purposes (for papers recommended by peer readers for publication).
Formation of the printed version of the Licensing Agreement between the Editorial Board of the Journal and authors and its sending by post.
Correspondence with paper authors (receipt and recording the Licensing Agreement with authors).
Registration of paper authors and paper metadata in ASM (Automated System of Management) with marking them with the identifiers of ORCID and sending to CrossRef, designation to the scientific publication of the authors the identifiers of DOI. The introduction of DOI information in the printed version of the paper.
Makeup of the Journal and papers electronic model.
Made-up Journal model Proof-reading before printing.
Agreement of the Journal model with the Editor-in-Chief.
Journal duplication and location on the site of the Journal network version.
Journal electronic version Layout in the scientific electronic library (E-library.ru).
Journal electronic version layout on the site of the University
Journal distribution.

Guidelines for the preparation and execution of scientific articles in journals indexed in international scientometric databases

Article template

Sample bibliographic references

The model author's contract

The order of publication of articles

In its activities the Editorial Board of the electronic Journal “Ergodesign” follows the Law No. 2121-1 “On Mass Media” (Ed. on July 3, 2016) of December 27, 1991 of the Russian Federation, Regulations “On the Journal “Ergodesign”, and also the recommendations and standards of the Committee on Ethics of Scientific Publications (COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors,http://publicationethics.org/).

The Editorial Board of the Journal does its best to comply with ethical standards adopted by the international scientific community, analyses and takes into account valuable experience of reputable international journals and publishers.

The Declaration of Scientific Publication Ethics reveals general principles and regulations on the relationships of participants in scientific publication procedures (authors, peer-readers, editors, publishers).

EDITORIAL BOARD OBLIGATIONS

Manuscript Assessment

Papers submitted for consideration must contain the results obtained by the authors which were not published elsewhere before.

The peer review procedure of papers received by the Editorial Board of the Journal is directed to ensuring quality of scientific papers published in the Journal. All papers submitted to the Editorial Board for publication are to be subjected to all stages of peer review.

A scientific paper undergoes a procedure of the peer review twice: an inner peer review is to be carried out by peer readers of the Journal Editorial Council; an external peer review is to be carried out by peer readers pronouncing independently their opinion regarding the level and definition of the presentation of the material presented its correspondence to the Journal scope, novelty and reliability of results. Peer readers’ recommendations are a reason for decision-making regarding paper publication. A paper may be rejected both at the stage of the inner peer review and at the stage of the external one.

The responsibility regarding decision-making for publication is completely in the competence of the Journal Editorial Board.

The Editorial Board of the Journal makes a decision on publication following Journal policy, taking into account a current legislation in the field of the copyright assessing manuscripts solely according to their scientific content. In case of the Editorial Board and peer readers’ positive decision-making a paper is to be published in the next issue of the Journal at that the authors’ rights are reserved.

In case of publication refusal a motivated response is to be sent to the author. A manuscript of the paper rejected is being kept at the Editorial Board at least a year. A paper peer review should be sent to the author without a peer reader’s name and a term in the course of which the author may write back on the peer review. At the author’s motivated substantiation of the paper material a repeated peer review is to be carried out and a publication problem should be solved.

Confidentiality

The editor and the whole of the Editorial Board staff have no right:

To disclose information regarding papers submitted except corresponding authors, peer readers, other editorial advisers and, in case of need, a publisher;
To use in any way the unpublished material used in the manuscript presented without author’s consent.

Interest conflict and ethical conflicts resolution

In case of the interests conflict arisen caused by competitive relationships, a cooperation or other relationships and ties with one of the authors, companies or offices connected with the manuscripts submitted for consideration the Editor forwards the manuscript for consideration to other members of the Editorial Board or the Editorial Council.

At filing an ethical complaint regarding a manuscript submitted or a paper published the Editor should undertake an adequate response jointly with the publisher. Each message on a fact of unethical action is to be considered, even if it is obtained years later after a paper publication. If a complaint is supported by the Editorial Board or by the Editorial Council of the Journal, then follows a publication of corresponding corrections, refutations or apologies.

Storage and pear review provision

In accordance with the requirements of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation the peer reviews of scientific papers are kept at the Editorial Board of the Journal in the course of at least 5 years and may be submitted to the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation when requested.

At the rejection of a paper for publication a paper peer review having reasons to decline publication is to be sent to the authors.

PEER READERS’ OBLIGATIONS

Contribution to editorial decisions

A peer review of the peer reader promotes editorial decision-making and also contributes to the quality improvement of the paper to be published by means of the Editor and author cooperation.

When discussing an author’s response to the peer review a peer reader has the right to take part in debates.

Efficiency

A peer reader should inform the Editor and refuse to analyze a paper by virtue of an insufficient own competence for the analysis of the investigation presented in the paper and also because of a high workload which may cause problems in the efficiency of peer review preparation.

Confidentiality

Any manuscript submitted for the peer review should be considered as a confidential document. It is unacceptable to show it to other peer readers or discuss it with other experts without a preliminary permission of the Editor-in-Chief.

Impartiality standards

Peer readers must express their opinion clearly and substantiated: reviews of scientific works must be impartial and should not contain personal criticism of the author.

Sources confirmation

Peer readers must:

Analyze sources used by the author and also reference identification quality of citations used in the paper;
Reveal materials published in the manuscript under peer review which are quoted, but are not identified bibliographically by the author;
Draw Editor’s attention to the significant or partial similarity with any other work which is directly familiar to the peer reader.

Information disclosure and interests conflict

Confidential classified information or ideas which a peer reader familiarized himself with in the course of peer reviewing must be confidential and should not be used by the peer reader for the personal gain or transfer to the third parties. Peer readers must not be enlisted by the Editorial Board to the participation in the peer review and assessment of manuscripts in which the peer readers have their own interest. The unpublished material used in the manuscript submitted for the peer review to the Editorial Board must not be used by a peer reader in the own investigations without an author’s written consent.

AUTHORS’ OBLIGATIONS

Reporting standards

Authors are to provide reliable results of the work done they should assess impartially the importance of the investigation carried out by them. Data assumed as a basis of the investigations should be stated clearly in the paper which must contain sufficient information to check up and repeat experiments by other researchers. Before a paper transfer to the Editorial Board for the peer review the authors must obtain permission in the form of an expert conclusion of the office, where the authors work for the application of the paper content.

Authors may place in the paper the information regarding financial support of the investigation the results of which are shown in it.

Data access and data storage

Authors may be requested to present initial data for the editorial analysis. They must be ready to provide a free access to such data, if it is required in the course of reasonable time past after their publication.

Singularity and plagiarism

Authors must provide only original works. When using text or graphic information obtained from other persons’ works references are essential to the corresponding publications or an author’s written permission. In the course of the peer review of the works presented by authors the Editorial Board checks up these works for plagiarism.

Multiple, repeated and competitive publications

Authors should point out in the abstract of the paper that their work is published for the first time. If parts of the manuscript are published in other paper, then the authors must make a reference to an earlier work and point out a significant difference of a new work from the previous one. A verbatim copying of own works and their paraphrasing are unacceptable they may be used only as a basis for new conclusions.

The paper submission simultaneously to several journals is considered to be an unethical action and unacceptable.

Sources confirmation

Authors must recognize a contribution of other persons influencing a character of the investigation carried out. References to the works used are essential. The information obtained from the third parties in private must not be used in the manuscript without their written permission for its use in the paper.

Paper authorship

The authors’ list must be limited with those, who made a significant contribution to the investigations, procedure and results of which are described in the paper. All persons, who made a considerable contribution to paper preparation, must be mentioned as co-authors. A paper may contain information of the participants of an investigation project. An author must ensure that the names of all co-authors and participants of the project are included in the lists of co-authors and participants and all co-authors permitted its publication being familiarized personally with the final version of the scientific work and having it approved.

The participants of the investigation project on material of which there was carried out a scientific paper and who had not been included into the list of paper co-authors should be mentioned in a separate reference after “Conclusion” section.

Quality of the matter submitted

A paper must be formed in accordance with the requirements of the Editorial Board of the Journal. Any deviation from the requirements mentioned is allowed being only in accordance with the agreement with the Editorial Board.

The information presented regarding the authors must be authentic. In case of any data changes the authors must inform of this fact the Editorial Board.

Significant errors in works published

If an author reveals a significant error or inaccuracy in his paper published, he must inform about this case immediately the Editor or the Publisher of the Journal and provide them assistance to eliminate or correct errors revealed.

If the Editor or the Publisher comes to know from the third party or from publications of other authors that a paper, published in the Journal, has significant errors, then the author must eliminate or correct them immediately, or present to the Editorial Board evidences of initial paper correctness. If the fact of significant error presence in the paper published is confirmed, then the Editorial Board must publish information regarding this case.

Publication process

Inclusion into the editorial database the documentation package for scientific work publication sent from the authors to the Editorial Board e-mail or the electronic Editorial Board of the Journal (on site).
Check-up of the material completeness presented by authors for scientific paper publication.
Manuscript check-up for borrowing presence with the use of “Anti-plagiarism” system. At the borrowing permissible level exceeding (more than 30%) follows the notification of authors regarding the necessity of correction the material submitted.
Peer review of a scientific paper by the staff of the Editorial Council of the Journal.
Maintenance of the paper peer review by the Editorial Council staff of the Journal.
Notification of authors regarding the necessity of paper material improvement (in the presence of peer readers’ recommendations) or the refusal to publish a paper in the Journal (by e-mail).
Check-up of the peer readers’ remarks fulfillment (in the presence of remarks) by the authors.
Scientific and literary editing the electronic form of papers, essential assistance to authors in the matter of the paper structure improvement, terms choice, figures formation, references correction in accordance with RSS R 7.0.5-2008 “References. General Requirements and Rules of Formation”.
Check-up in accordance with original sources the correctness of citations used and digital data, the application of names and their spelling, scientific-technical terms, measurement units, the correspondence of the symbols used to notations defined by standards or adopted in scientific literature.
Paper text agreement by means of e-mail after editing.
Technical translation into English of the paper title, author’s name, paper abstract, key words, authors’ data and references.
Preparation of the electronic version of the Licensing Agreement between the Editorial Board of the Journal and authors on authors’ data processing, metadata formation of the paper to be published to confer it the identifier of DOI (Digital Object Identifier) with the purpose of the further offer to the users of Internet a possibility to search, review and free use paper materials with the information, scientific and educational purposes (for papers recommended by peer readers for publication).
Formation of the printed version of the Licensing Agreement between the Editorial Board of the Journal and authors and its sending by post.
Correspondence with paper authors (receipt and recording the Licensing Agreement with authors).
Registration of paper authors and paper metadata in ASM (Automated System of Management) with marking them with the identifiers of ORCID and sending to CrossRef, designation to the scientific publication of the authors the identifiers of DOI. The introduction of DOI information in the printed version of the paper.
Makeup of the Journal and papers electronic model.
Made-up Journal model Proof-reading before printing.
Agreement of the Journal model with the Editor-in-Chief.
Journal duplication and location on the site of the Journal network version.
Journal electronic version Layout in the scientific electronic library (E-library.ru).
Journal electronic version layout on the site of the University
Journal distribution.

Article retraction process

List of retracted articles

Editorial collegium

Spasennikov Valeriy — Editor-in-chief
Bryansk State Technical University ( kafedra "Gumanitarnye discipliny" , prof. )
doctor of psychological sciences
professor
Bryansk , Bryansk , Russian Federation

Kuz'menko Aleksandr — Deputy chief editor
Bryansk State Technical University ( kafedra "KTS" , docent )
candidate of biological sciences
Bryansk , Bryansk , Russian Federation

Kondratenko Sergey — Executive Secretary of the editorial Board
Bryansk , Russian Federation

Arpent'eva Mar'yam Ravil'evna — Editorial Committee
Kaluga , Russian Federation

Demidenko Eduard Semenovich — Editorial Committee
Kalinigrad , Russian Federation

Efstefeeva Elena Aleksandrovna — Chairman of Editorial Committee
Tver , Russian Federation

Zadorozhnyuk Ivan — Chairman Assistant
Moscow , Russian Federation

Kirichek Andrey — Editorial Committee
Bryansk State Technical University ( Professor, Pro-rector for Promising Development )
employee
doctor of technical sciences
professor
Bryansk , Bryansk , Russian Federation

Kushnir Aleksandr Petrovich — Editorial Committee
Moscow , Russian Federation

Kos'kin Aleksandr Vasil'evich — Editorial Committee
Orel , Russian Federation

Lebedev Aleksandr Nikolaevich — Editorial Committee
Moscow , Russian Federation

Lozbinev Fedor Yur'evich — Editorial Committee
Bryansk , Russian Federation

Martynov Vitaliy Vladimirovich — Editorial Committee
Ufa , Russian Federation

Morozova Anna Valentinovna — Editorial Committee
Bryansk , Russian Federation

Paderno Pavel — Editorial Committee
St. Petersburg State Electrotechnical University "LETI" ( kafedra "Inzhenernoy psihologii i ergonomiki" , professor )
doctor of technical sciences
Sankt-Peterburg , St. Petersburg , Russian Federation

Sergeev Sergey — Editorial Committee
St. Petersburg State University ( prof )
doctor of psychological sciences
Sankt-Peterburg , St. Petersburg , Russian Federation

Suharev Oleg — Editorial Committee
Institute of economy RAS ( prof )
doctor of economic sciences
Moskva , Moscow , Russian Federation

Fedotov Sergey — Editorial Committee
Kikotya Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs ( Prof. )
doctor of psychological sciences
Moskva , Moscow , Russian Federation

Hudyakov Andrey — Editorial Committee
Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia ( kafedra "Obschey i professional'noy pedagogiki" , professor )
doctor of psychological sciences
Sankt-Peterburg , St. Petersburg , Russian Federation

Cincar' Anna Leonidovna — Editorial Committee
Transnistria

Larecheva Elena — editorial board
Bryansk , Russian Federation

Dergachev Konstantin — Editorial board
Bryansk State Technical University ( kafedra "IiPO" , docent )
candidate of technical sciences
Bryansk , Bryansk , Russian Federation

Podvesovskiy Aleksandr — Editorial board
Bryansk State Technical University ( kafedra "Informatika i programmnoe obespechenie" , zaveduyuschiy kafedroy )
candidate of technical sciences
docent
Bryansk , Russian Federation

Golubeva Galina — Editorial board
Bryansk State University named after academician I. Petrovsky ( docent )
candidate of psychological sciences
Bryansk , Bryansk , Russian Federation

Kondratenko Sergey — Executive Secretary of the editorial Board
Bryansk , Russian Federation

Pester Andreas — Editorial Committee
Austria

Averchenkov Vladimir — Editorial Committee
Bryansk State Technical University ( Professor )
doctor of technical sciences
professor
Bryansk , Bryansk , Russian Federation

Neverov Aleksandr — Editorial Committee

Yakimov Anatoliy — Editorial Committee

Alisov Artur — Editorial board
Bryansk State Technical University ( Upravlenie monitoringa NPR i nauchnyh pereodicheskih izdaniy , Principle Engineer )
Orel , Orel , Russian Federation

Rytov Mikhail — Editorial board
Bryansk State Technical University ( Head )
candidate of technical sciences
docent
Bryansk , Russian Federation

EDITOR COLUMN

Articles of the rubric

METHODOLOGY OF DESIGN ERGONOMIC SUPPORT

Articles of the rubric

REQUIREMENTS STANDARDIZATION IN ERGONOMICS AND DESIGN

Articles of the rubric

EVOLUTION OF VIEWS AND INSTRUMENTS OF MAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION

Articles of the rubric

ERGONOMICS AND DESIGN IN DESIGNING USER INTERFACES

Articles of the rubric

ERGONOMICS AND DESIGN IN TRANSPORT AND MECHANICAL ENGINEERING

Articles of the rubric

TRAINING SIMULATORS, VIRTUAL REALITY AND STAFF TRAINING

Articles of the rubric

PEDAGOGICAL DESIGN AND ELECTRONIC DIDACTICS

Articles of the rubric

CURRENT EVENTS. CONFERENCES, SYMPOSIUMS AND OTHER ERGO-DESIGN ACTIONS

Articles of the rubric

05.13.10 MANAGTEMENT IN SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC SYSTEMS. METHODOLOGY OF ERGONOMIC SUPPORT OF DESIN-PLANNING

Articles of the rubric

05.13.12 COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN SYSTEMS (BY INDUSTRY). ERGONOMICS AND DESIGN IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF USER INTERFACES

Articles of the rubric

19.00.03 PSYCHOLOGY OF WORK, ENGINEERING PSYCHOLOGY, ERGONOMICS. EVOLUTION OF VIEWS AND TOOLS OF HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION

Articles of the rubric

19.00.07 PEDAGOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY. PEDAGOGICAL DESIGN AND E-DIDACTICS

Articles of the rubric

SYSTEM ANALYSIS AND MANAGEMENT. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

Articles of the rubric

MANAGTEMENT IN SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC SYSTEMS

Articles of the rubric

TECHNICAL AESTHETICS. INDUSTRIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN

Articles of the rubric

ERGONOMICS. TECHNICAL AESTHETICS. INDUSTRIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN

Articles of the rubric

Publisher

Bryansk State Technical University

Founder

Bryansk State Technical University

The certificate of registration(online)

Эл № ФС77-73849

Date of registration of the certificate(online)

05.10.2018

Description of the journal

The Journal mission consists in the presentation of a free area for original first-published investigations in the field of ergodesign which contribute to the dissemination of the best domestic and foreign practice in the field mentioned.

The mission of the scientific journal “Ergodesign” is a coordination of efforts by designers and users of new systems, products and technologies in the field of ergonomic support of design-projects.

Journal policy

The Journal editorial policy is based upon the following principles:

The objectivity and impartiality in papers selection with the purpose of their publication.
High demand to the quality of scientific investigations.
The observance of authenticity, scientific significance and topicality of works to be published.
Collective nature in decision-making regarding paper publication.
Accessibility and efficiency in communication with authors.
Strict compliance with copyright and editorial ethics.
Strict observance of Journal schedule.

Author’s material presented for the publication must meet the following requirements: theme topicality, scientific novelty of the investigation, singularity of the investigation problem and investigation methods used, high scientific and practical significance of the results obtained. Papers in English and Russian are accepted.

Materials submitted to the Journal are subjected to a primary selection for the correspondence to the stated scientific scope of the edition, general informative requirements and requirements to the references formation. In case of initial selection passing this material is sent to the peer review.

After peer review fulfillment the peer review text and a copy of the manuscript with the scientific editor and peer reader’s remarks are to be sent to the author for the improvement.

The Editorial Board has right to reject paper publication on the basis of the peer review results, material non-correspondence to the Journal scope and also at the unsatisfactory quality of the formation of the materials submitted .

The Editorial Board takes responsibility in paper preparation for publication, in assurance of conscientious peer review, but is not responsible for the accuracy of specific data produced by the authors and citation correctness.

The solution on publication or rejection to publish papers submitted to the Journal is made by the Editorial Board in accordance with the Declaration of Scientific Publication Ethics.

The acceptance of papers for publication in the Journal is carried out constantly. The Editorial Board makes decision independently regarding the order and terms of paper publication reasoning from their scientific significance, themes of each edition and quality of the preliminary manuscript preparation.

The ergodesign formation in Russia as a scientific direction is connected with that the subject of investigation in the field of design activities are not systems and products themselves and not only man as a subject of production, but also the agreement of man’s physical, psycho-physical potentialities and peculiarities of ergonomical systems in the course of their designing. The tendencies of ergodesign development result in the necessity of the use of methods developed and criteria in any human activity both in production, and in private life.

The application of ergodesign achievements is a significant direction in the improvement of consumer properties of industrial produce and labor conditions and standardization of requirements of this scientific subject is the most efficient means in the solutions of problems mentioned.

Safety, comfort, ergonomics, esthetics of systems under creation, products and technologies from the point of view of designing must be realized in the best domestic samples of engineering and define competitive ability of our produce in the world market.

Manuscript guidelines

Inclusion into the editorial database the documentation package for scientific work publication sent from the authors to the Editorial Board e-mail or the electronic Editorial Board of the Journal (on site).
Check-up of the material completeness presented by authors for scientific paper publication.
Manuscript check-up for borrowing presence with the use of “Anti-plagiarism” system. At the borrowing permissible level exceeding (more than 30%) follows the notification of authors regarding the necessity of correction the material submitted.
Peer review of a scientific paper by the staff of the Editorial Council of the Journal.
Maintenance of the paper peer review by the Editorial Council staff of the Journal.
Notification of authors regarding the necessity of paper material improvement (in the presence of peer readers’ recommendations) or the refusal to publish a paper in the Journal (by e-mail).
Check-up of the peer readers’ remarks fulfillment (in the presence of remarks) by the authors.
Scientific and literary editing the electronic form of papers, essential assistance to authors in the matter of the paper structure improvement, terms choice, figures formation, references correction in accordance with RSS R 7.0.5-2008 “References. General Requirements and Rules of Formation”.
Check-up in accordance with original sources the correctness of citations used and digital data, the application of names and their spelling, scientific-technical terms, measurement units, the correspondence of the symbols used to notations defined by standards or adopted in scientific literature.
Paper text agreement by means of e-mail after editing.
Technical translation into English of the paper title, author’s name, paper abstract, key words, authors’ data and references.
Preparation of the electronic version of the Licensing Agreement between the Editorial Board of the Journal and authors on authors’ data processing, metadata formation of the paper to be published to confer it the identifier of DOI (Digital Object Identifier) with the purpose of the further offer to the users of Internet a possibility to search, review and free use paper materials with the information, scientific and educational purposes (for papers recommended by peer readers for publication).
Formation of the printed version of the Licensing Agreement between the Editorial Board of the Journal and authors and its sending by post.
Correspondence with paper authors (receipt and recording the Licensing Agreement with authors).
Registration of paper authors and paper metadata in ASM (Automated System of Management) with marking them with the identifiers of ORCID and sending to CrossRef, designation to the scientific publication of the authors the identifiers of DOI. The introduction of DOI information in the printed version of the paper.
Makeup of the Journal and papers electronic model.
Made-up Journal model Proof-reading before printing.
Agreement of the Journal model with the Editor-in-Chief.
Journal duplication and location on the site of the Journal network version.
Journal electronic version Layout in the scientific electronic library (E-library.ru).
Journal electronic version layout on the site of the University
Journal distribution.

Guidelines for the preparation and execution of scientific articles in journals indexed in international scientometric databases

Article template

Sample bibliographic references

The model author's contract

The order of publication of articles

Ethics of publication

EDITORIAL BOARD OBLIGATIONS

Manuscript Assessment

Papers submitted for consideration must contain the results obtained by the authors which were not published elsewhere before.

The responsibility regarding decision-making for publication is completely in the competence of the Journal Editorial Board.

Confidentiality

The editor and the whole of the Editorial Board staff have no right:

To disclose information regarding papers submitted except corresponding authors, peer readers, other editorial advisers and, in case of need, a publisher;
To use in any way the unpublished material used in the manuscript presented without author’s consent.

Interest conflict and ethical conflicts resolution

Storage and pear review provision

At the rejection of a paper for publication a paper peer review having reasons to decline publication is to be sent to the authors.

PEER READERS’ OBLIGATIONS

Contribution to editorial decisions

A peer review of the peer reader promotes editorial decision-making and also contributes to the quality improvement of the paper to be published by means of the Editor and author cooperation.

When discussing an author’s response to the peer review a peer reader has the right to take part in debates.

Efficiency

Confidentiality

Impartiality standards

Peer readers must express their opinion clearly and substantiated: reviews of scientific works must be impartial and should not contain personal criticism of the author.

Sources confirmation

Peer readers must:

Analyze sources used by the author and also reference identification quality of citations used in the paper;
Reveal materials published in the manuscript under peer review which are quoted, but are not identified bibliographically by the author;
Draw Editor’s attention to the significant or partial similarity with any other work which is directly familiar to the peer reader.

Information disclosure and interests conflict

AUTHORS’ OBLIGATIONS

Reporting standards

Authors may place in the paper the information regarding financial support of the investigation the results of which are shown in it.

Data access and data storage

Singularity and plagiarism

Multiple, repeated and competitive publications

The paper submission simultaneously to several journals is considered to be an unethical action and unacceptable.

Sources confirmation

Paper authorship

Quality of the matter submitted

The information presented regarding the authors must be authentic. In case of any data changes the authors must inform of this fact the Editorial Board.

Significant errors in works published

Publication process

Inclusion into the editorial database the documentation package for scientific work publication sent from the authors to the Editorial Board e-mail or the electronic Editorial Board of the Journal (on site).
Check-up of the material completeness presented by authors for scientific paper publication.
Manuscript check-up for borrowing presence with the use of “Anti-plagiarism” system. At the borrowing permissible level exceeding (more than 30%) follows the notification of authors regarding the necessity of correction the material submitted.
Peer review of a scientific paper by the staff of the Editorial Council of the Journal.
Maintenance of the paper peer review by the Editorial Council staff of the Journal.
Notification of authors regarding the necessity of paper material improvement (in the presence of peer readers’ recommendations) or the refusal to publish a paper in the Journal (by e-mail).
Check-up of the peer readers’ remarks fulfillment (in the presence of remarks) by the authors.
Scientific and literary editing the electronic form of papers, essential assistance to authors in the matter of the paper structure improvement, terms choice, figures formation, references correction in accordance with RSS R 7.0.5-2008 “References. General Requirements and Rules of Formation”.
Check-up in accordance with original sources the correctness of citations used and digital data, the application of names and their spelling, scientific-technical terms, measurement units, the correspondence of the symbols used to notations defined by standards or adopted in scientific literature.
Paper text agreement by means of e-mail after editing.
Technical translation into English of the paper title, author’s name, paper abstract, key words, authors’ data and references.
Preparation of the electronic version of the Licensing Agreement between the Editorial Board of the Journal and authors on authors’ data processing, metadata formation of the paper to be published to confer it the identifier of DOI (Digital Object Identifier) with the purpose of the further offer to the users of Internet a possibility to search, review and free use paper materials with the information, scientific and educational purposes (for papers recommended by peer readers for publication).
Formation of the printed version of the Licensing Agreement between the Editorial Board of the Journal and authors and its sending by post.
Correspondence with paper authors (receipt and recording the Licensing Agreement with authors).
Registration of paper authors and paper metadata in ASM (Automated System of Management) with marking them with the identifiers of ORCID and sending to CrossRef, designation to the scientific publication of the authors the identifiers of DOI. The introduction of DOI information in the printed version of the paper.
Makeup of the Journal and papers electronic model.
Made-up Journal model Proof-reading before printing.
Agreement of the Journal model with the Editor-in-Chief.
Journal duplication and location on the site of the Journal network version.
Journal electronic version Layout in the scientific electronic library (E-library.ru).
Journal electronic version layout on the site of the University
Journal distribution.

Advertisers

ADVERTISEMENT PLACEMENT

in scientific publications

№	Type of advertisement place	Price (without VAT), Rubles/Issue
1	Cover, 2-nd and 4-th page (module size 280×185 mm)	10 000
2	Cover, 3-d page (module size 280×185 mm)	8 000
3	Black-White, inside the journal (module size 165×240 mm)	4 000
4	Black-White, inside the journal (module size 165×120 mm)	3 000
5	Black-White, inside the journal (module size 165×60 mm)	2 000
6	Advertisement making	5 000 Rubles/Module

ADVERTISEMENT PLACEMENT

on the sites of scientific publications

№	Type of advertisement place	Price (without VAT), Rubles/Month
1	Through (on all pages) advertisement banner placement with size 180×180 pixels in the left column of the website. Dynamicbanner.	4 000
2	Through (on all pages) advertisement banner placement with size160×160 pixels in the right column. Dynamic banner.	3 000
3	Banners exchange 100×100 pixels at mutual interest	1 000
4	Advertisement making	5 000 Rubles/Module

Article retraction process

List of retracted articles

Periodicity

Periodichnost' vypuska zhurnala - ezhekvartal'no; ob'em – do 50 Mb.

All journal's authors | Authors quantity 92

Golubeva Galina Bryansk State University named after academician I. Petrovsky ( Assistant Prof. )
Bryansk , Bryansk , Russian Federation

Golubeva Galina Bryansk State University named after academician I. Petrovsky ( docent )
candidate of psychological sciences
Bryansk , Bryansk , Russian Federation

Grabezhov Ilya Bryansk State Technical University ( senior lecturer )
Bryansk , Bryansk , Russian Federation

Davydova Evgeniya National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University ( School of Computer Science & Robotics , senior teacher )
employee
Tomsk , Tomsk , Russian Federation

Denisov Dmitry Siberian regional business school ( teacher )
candidate of agricultural sciences
Omsk , Omsk , Russian Federation

Dergachev Konstantin Bryansk State Technical University ( kafedra "IiPO" , docent )
candidate of technical sciences
Bryansk , Bryansk , Russian Federation

Domogatsky Konstantin Orel College of agribusiness and service, mountains ( Director )
Mcensk , Orel , Russian Federation

Dynina Inna Bryansk State Technical University ( department «CTS» , master degree student )
Bryansk , Bryansk , Russian Federation

Ermakova Ekaterina Bryansk State Technical University ( Department "GaSD” , ass. prof. )
Bryansk , Bryansk , Russian Federation

Erokhin Dmitriy Bryansk State Technical University ( kafedra «Ekonomika i menedzhment» , zaveduyuschiy kafedroy )
candidate of economic sciences

Efremenko Anastasia National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University ( School of Information Technology and Robotics , student )
Tomsk , Tomsk , Russian Federation

Zhadaev Dmitriy Shevchenko Transdnistrian State Technical University ( Post graduate student )
Bendere , Transnistria

Zaitseva Anastasiya Bryanskiy stroitel'nyy kolledzh im. professora N.E. Zhukovskogo ( Student )
Bryansk , Bryansk , Russian Federation

Islamov G. Bryansk State Technical University ( Student )
Bryansk , Bryansk , Russian Federation

Kazakov Yuriy Bryansk State Technical University ( department «CTS» , assistent Prof. )
candidate of technical sciences
Bryansk , Bryansk , Russian Federation

Kashirina Lada Bryansk State Technical University ( Master degree student )
Bryansk , Bryansk , Russian Federation

Kirichek Andrey Bryansk State Technical University ( Professor, Pro-rector for Promising Development )
employee
doctor of technical sciences
professor
Bryansk , Bryansk , Russian Federation

Kozlenkova Alla Bryansk State Technical University ( department «TM» , post-graduate student )
graduate student of architecture
Bryansk , Bryansk , Russian Federation

Kondratenko Sergey Bryansk State Technical University ( docent )
candidate of technical sciences
Bryansk , Bryansk , Russian Federation

Kondrashin Dmitriy Bryansk State Technical University ( department «Computer technologies and systems» , Master degree student )
Bryansk , Bryansk , Russian Federation